GeoSite Intel
builders pre-construction • drainage • terrain risk screening

Identify drainage and terrain risks before you break ground.

GeoSite Intel delivers builder-focused site screening using high-resolution LiDAR terrain and practical hydrology signals. I flag likely runoff pathways, low-spot pooling cues, and potential problem zones so you can prioritize field checks, reduce surprises, and make cleaner pre-permit decisions.

Best for

Custom home builders, spec builders, and small developers who want a fast, practical read on runoff pathways, low spots, and where drainage problems may show up before permitting, grading, or purchase.

Contact

geositeintel@outlook.com

Send an address / parcel and what you’re deciding (lot selection, pre-permit, grading concerns, recurring water issues). I’ll reply with scope, data sources, turnaround, and an estimate.

Case Study 01: Frog Level / Davenport Farm Corridor

A corridor-focused screening built to highlight drainage pathways, terrain-driven low spots, and map-ready communication for fast review.

Case Study 01: Frog Level / Davenport Farm Corridor layout preview
Case Study 01 — Frog Level / Davenport Farm Corridor (screening layout)

What was delivered

  • Portfolio-ready layout (print + shareable)
  • Drainage pathways and runoff direction cues
  • Low-spot signals using LiDAR terrain context
  • Corridor framing for quick stakeholder review
  • Clean labels + legend for non-technical audiences

What it helps answer

  • Where does water likely concentrate along the corridor?
  • Which segments show the strongest low-spot / pooling cues?
  • Where could road + drainage conflicts appear?
  • What should be field-verified first?
  • How do we communicate risk clearly to stakeholders?

Data used

  • High-resolution LiDAR DEM (terrain)
  • Hydrology layers (streams/drainage where available)
  • Road + building layers (public sources)
  • Cartographic cleanup for clarity and sharing

This is a screening product to inform decisions and prioritize next steps (not a sealed engineering design).

Why this approach works

Many maps look good but don’t answer the real question. This workflow keeps it practical: terrain → flow → risk cues → clear communication.

Builder-friendly

Outputs that read fast in the field or a meeting — without GIS jargon.

Engineering-style logic

Repeatable analysis patterns: terrain first, then flow signals, then risk cues.

Clean cartography

Layouts built for sharing: reports, emails, city review, and client updates.

How it works

Simple workflow. Clean deliverables. No confusion.

1) Intake

Send the address/parcel + what decision you’re making.

2) Scope + estimate

I reply with scope, datasets, and an estimate based on complexity + timeline.

3) Draft checkpoint

You get a midpoint preview to confirm AOI, labels, and clarity.

4) Delivery

Final map(s) delivered as PDF/PNG. Optional walkthrough if helpful.

Avoid costly drainage surprises.

Before permitting, grading, or purchase — get a terrain-based screening that flags likely runoff concentration, low-elevation pockets, and areas to field-check first.

Request estimate Email me